What Happened

The IRGC statement, carried by Iranian state media on Nov. 13, called the strike a response to “the enemy’s air aggression against a telecommunications tower in Sirik” [2]. It warned that if “violations and aggression” continue, its aerospace force is “on full alert to confront the enemy without constraint” [1]. The statement stopped short of directly naming the United States as the attacker in Sirik [2].

CENTCOM’s statement did not mention Sirik at all [2]. Sirik hosts part of Iran’s radar and communications network watching the strait, and it has been hit repeatedly since U.S. and Israeli strikes opened the war on Feb. 28 [2]. Bahrain hosts the headquarters of the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet and has been a frequent Iranian target during the eight-month conflict [3].

The exchange came a day after President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, “We don’t need a deal with Iran. Those days have long since passed” [2]. In the same post he said he had asked Vice President JD Vance, who had spent months leading cease-fire and nuclear talks, to turn his attention to Democratic-run cities and states [2]. Iranian officials had seen Vance as the most trustworthy figure close to Trump [1]. Trump has also said Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE and Bahrain asked him to hold off on further strikes; that account has not been independently confirmed by all of those governments [3].

The same day, Iran’s Assembly of Experts, the clerical body that chooses the supreme leader, called a review of Iran’s membership in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty an “unavoidable necessity” [1].

Why It Matters

U.S. service members in Bahrain sit on the receiving end of this. The IRGC is now threatening strikes “without geographical restrictions,” and says companies accused of working with the U.S. could face punishment too [3]. Meanwhile, the U.S. keeps up a naval blockade of Iranian ports, and Iran restricts shipping through Hormuz [3]. Iran’s army said two oil tankers caught fire after hitting naval mines in the eastern strait on Nov. 12 [2].

Our Read

I read this as the war’s “lull” doing what lulls do in a blockade: neither side is at peace, and each tit-for-tat is one bad intercept away from casualties. My working rule is the belligerent-source rule. Iran’s claim of a destroyed radar is unverified, and so is CENTCOM’s clean “no damage.” What both sides agree on is the part that matters: Iran launched drones toward the island that hosts the Fifth Fleet, and CENTCOM chose not to deny the strike on Iran’s coast that Iran says provoked it.

The bigger shift is in Washington. Sidelining Vance, the one negotiator the Iranians reportedly trusted, and declaring the deal dead removes the off-ramp. That leaves the war file with the people who run the war. Pair that with Iranian clerics openly debating leaving the nonproliferation treaty, and the stated U.S. war aim, no Iranian bomb, looks further away after eight months of fighting, not closer.

The Other Side

Trump has framed the current posture as restraint backed by pressure. He said he will attack Iran only if necessary, and that Gulf allies asked him to “let it be the way it is now for a while” [3] [1]. He argues preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon is worth higher diesel prices [1]. CENTCOM’s position is that its defenses worked: two drones down, no one hurt, nothing damaged [2].

Will Democrats Strip the US-Israel Weapons Pact From the Defense Bill?

What happened. The Senate’s version of the fiscal 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes Section 219, a “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” to “expand and accelerate bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation, coordination, and industrial cooperation” [4]. The Senate bill, S. 4784, stalled on July 14 when cloture on the motion to proceed failed 50-46 [6]. Current stopgap Pentagon funding runs out Dec. 11, the NDAA needs 60 votes to pass the Senate, and Democrats take both chambers in January [4]. A dozen senators, including Bernie Sanders, Ron Wyden and Tammy Duckworth, signed a letter this week opposing the provision [4]. The letter warns the provision could “create long-term dependencies by embedding Israeli technology into the US defense industrial base that could make future policy changes costly or difficult to implement” [4]. In the House, Democrat Ro Khanna and Republican Thomas Massie say they will try to strip it [5]. Neither Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer nor House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has stated a public position [4].

Our read. This is yesterday’s FISA story with different stakes: a lame-duck Congress trying to lock in policy before a new majority can touch it. The senators’ warning about dependencies is the risk I’d watch. Once a joint program has suppliers and jobs attached, it stops being a line item Congress can vote down and becomes a constituency. Democrats hold a filibuster, and with 60 votes required, they decide whether that happens now.

The other side. Backers want exactly that permanence. Mark Dubowitz of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies has written that the two countries should integrate so deeply “that inflicting financial harm on Israel would also carry a significant cost for Washington” [5]. Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on House Armed Services, initially supported the provision before opposing it [4].

Watch For

• Dec. 11: current stopgap Pentagon funding expires, forcing another stopgap or a final NDAA vote [4].

• Further IRGC or CENTCOM statements on Sirik and Bahrain, and any Bahraini government comment, which had not come as of Friday [3].

Read the Senate bill’s record yourself at Congress.gov, then call your senators through the Capitol switchboard, (202) 224-3121, and ask one question: will they vote for an NDAA that still contains Section 219?

Open questions: If the U.S. did strike Sirik, why won’t CENTCOM say so? And will Schumer and Jeffries spend their 60-vote leverage before January, or save it?

Related Reading

• Banner Brief: Will Congress Renew Warrantless Spying Before Democrats Take Over?

• US Military Affairs this week: strikes on Iran’s Qeshm Island, Trump’s Israel aid pledge, and more

• Palantalk | E50 - Mission Not Accomplished

Sources

1. The Guardian — Iran says it targeted US military radar in Bahrain in retaliatory strike. By Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor, published Nov 13, 2026, updated Nov 14, 2026

2. rferl.org — CENTCOM Denies Iranian Claim It Struck A US Radar In Bahrain. By RFE/RL, published Nov 13, 2026

3. ibtimes.com — US Denies Iran’s Claim Of Radar Strike In Bahrain. Says Two Drones Were Shot Down.. By Merin Rebecca Thomas, published Nov 13, 2026

4. Al Jazeera — Will Democrats try to strip US-Israel initiative from Pentagon funding?. By Joseph Stepansky, published Nov 13, 2026

5. The Intercept — Congress Might Sneakily Use Lame Duck to Deeply Intertwine the U.S. and Israeli Militaries. By Josh Ruebner, published Nov 13, 2026

6. Congress.gov — S. 4784: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027. By Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS], published Jun 15, 2026, updated Nov 13, 2026

Compiled from 6 sources across 6 outlets. Source text as of Nov 14, 2026.

Actions You Can Take

Check out our new shared community calendar:

• Broad Banner

Call your public servants on important issues:

• 5calls.org

Join the efforts to de-flock the States:

• deflock.me

Service members can get un-biased information on legal vs illegal orders:

• Orders Project

• Reach out on Signal: @TheOrdersProject.76

Banner & Backbone Authors’ Notes

Check out the new BroadBanner network and affiliate calendar!

Donate to Feeding America, today!

You being here shows that you have already begun the process of unfurling new Banners and forging new Backbones for a more progressive America. Please, take the time to become a paid, or free, subscriber to the Network — supporting us all and ensuring everyone in America can hear these messages.

The America we strive for — it is one where we willingly remember the teachings of our past, humbly learn from our failings, proudly celebrate our successes, and boldly lead the way into a future for all people.

Subscribe now

Reach out to the team if you are interested in volunteering time, supporting, and building these community driven platforms:

• Submit feedback directly to: info@bannerandbackbone.com

Support and subscribe to Banner & Backbone!

What Happened

Section 702 lets U.S. intelligence agencies collect the electronic communications of people outside the United States without a warrant [1]. Americans’ data can be collected and searched without a warrant when they are in contact with targeted noncitizens [3]. The authority lapsed on June 12 after Democrats voted against renewal [3]. In a June 5 Senate vote, Republican Sens. Mike Lee, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley and four other Republicans also voted no [3]. Although it expired, surveillance operations under it can continue through next March [2].

Himes told Politico he spoke with Senate Majority Leader John Thune about a renewal [3]. “If that fails, we’ll do something in the first quarter,” Himes said [2][3]. He also said “it’s going to be a very different 702 that gets reauthorized in the first quarter of next year,” as The Hill reported [1].

Two Senate Democrats backed him. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said “it becomes much more difficult in a new Congress,” and Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., said it should be renewed “as soon as possible” [2].

The coalition letter’s signers include the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Center for Democracy & Technology and the Brennan Center for Justice [2]. They want a warrant requirement for searching Americans’ communications in 702 databases and a ban on the government buying Americans’ information from data brokers, the so-called “data broker loophole” [2]. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., has a bill, the Surveillance Accountability Act (H.R. 8470), that would require probable cause before federal law enforcement accesses Americans’ private digital data [3][4]. It has sat in the House Judiciary Committee since April 23 [4].

Why It Matters

The letter says 702 “has been abused to spy on protesters on the left and the right; 19,000 donors to a congressional campaign; members of Congress and their staff; and multiple government officials, political commentators, and journalists” [2]. It also warns that artificial intelligence (AI) tools make it “cheaper and easier than ever for the government to compile and analyze Americans’ data at scale” [2].

“No member of Congress knows who will occupy the White House in the years ahead, and constitutional protections should not depend on who is president.” — coalition letter to congressional leaders [2]

Himes takes over as chair of the House Intelligence Committee in January [1]. He has promised “aggressive” oversight, including a look at defense contractors’ donations to Trump construction projects [1].

Our Read

The mechanism is leverage. Section 702 is still running on borrowed time until March, so nothing forces a vote this month. A renewal tucked into a must-pass defense bill would lock in today’s terms without a separate floor fight. Once Democrats hold both chambers, a warrant requirement becomes something they can bargain for instead of something they ask for.

Himes’s own words make the case for waiting: he expects a “very different” bill next year. That suggests the lame-duck push is less about national security timing than about avoiding the version a new majority would write. The overlap with the right matters too. Lee, Paul, Hawley and Massie want the same warrant that civil liberties groups do, which suggests a reform bill could find votes on both sides in January. What’s missing from this week’s reporting is any public evidence that the lapse has hurt an investigation, the argument that would justify rushing.

The Other Side

Himes has called Section 702, even under the Trump administration, the country’s “most rigorously overseen” surveillance program and told Wired he has seen “zero evidence of abuse” [1]. Warner’s case is practical: “it becomes much more difficult in a new Congress” [2]. President Donald Trump called for passing 702 in an April 15 statement, after years of opposing it [3].

Palantir’s CEO Says His Products Are “Progressive.” Will Democrats Buy It?

What happened. Palantir CEO Alex Karp told Politico that Palantir’s products are “essentially progressive” and said, “I’ve been a Democrat my whole life” [5][6]. Palantir works with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to monitor immigrants and builds AI systems for the U.S. military [5]. Karp donated $1 million to MAGA Inc. in 2024, and about half of Palantir’s revenue comes from government work, Wired reported [6]. Speaking to investors, Karp said he wanted to make sure “the people that made fun of you and made fun of us are suffering” [6].

Our read. This is the same story as FISA from the vendor’s side. The surveillance tools and the money flowing to them were built under one Congress, and their makers now need the next one. The pattern to watch is whether the new majority treats contractors’ politics as noise and their contracts as the record.

The other side. Karp argues Palantir’s products are “built to avoid war,” because adversaries know “they will have such pain inflicted upon them that in fact it’s not worth going to war” [6]. Defense reporter Sharon Weinberger told Mother Jones she doesn’t doubt Karp “has real beliefs,” and that companies must “survive in Democratic and Republican administrations” [5].

Watch For

• Now through year end: whether a Section 702 renewal is added to the NDAA or another must-pass bill in the lame-duck session [2].

• January: Himes takes over the House Intelligence Committee [1].

• March: surveillance under the lapsed authority can run until then [2].

Call your representative and both senators. Ask whether they will oppose any 702 renewal in the NDAA, and whether they support a warrant requirement like the one in H.R. 8470.

Open questions: If a warrant requirement has support on both the left and the right, who benefits from passing 702 without one? Will the new Intelligence Committee’s look at contractor donations extend to the companies that build the surveillance tools?

Related Reading

• This Week in Palantalk: A $1 Trillion Pentagon Fight, Shield AI’s $5.3 Billion Radar Bet & More

• This Week in Palantalk: ICE’s voter files and Palantir, Anduril’s $2.9 billion sub deal & more

• This Week in Palantalk: ICE’s $100 Million Intelligence Network, the Voter-Data Fight & More

Palantalk - where we talk tech, no fascism.

Sources

1. Mother Jones — Top Intelligence Democrat Says GOP Should Renew Spy Program Before Democrats Take Over. By Sophie Hurwitz and Schuyler Mitchell, published Nov 12, 2026

2. commondreams.org — As Key Democrats Betray Party and US Public, Coalition Says Don’t Renew Spying Power in NDAA. By jessica-corbett, published Nov 12, 2026

3. dailycaller.com — Democrat Pushes GOP Leadership To Renew Warrantless Spying Before His Party Takes Power. By Nicole Silverio, published Nov 12, 2026

4. Congress.gov — H.R. 8470: Surveillance Accountability Act. By Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4], published Apr 23, 2026, updated Sep 19, 2026

5. Mother Jones — Alex Karp Wants to Be Friends With Democrats Again. By Sophie Hurwitz, published Nov 12, 2026

6. Wired — Alex Karp Said He’s a ‘Progressive.’ OK! Here’s Some Other Stuff He’s Said Recently. By Caroline Haskins, published Nov 12, 2026

Compiled from 6 sources across 5 outlets. Source text as of Nov 13, 2026.

Actions You Can Take

Check out our new shared community calendar:

• Broad Banner

Call your public servants on important issues:

• 5calls.org

Join the efforts to de-flock the States:

• deflock.me

Service members can get un-biased information on legal vs illegal orders:

• Orders Project

• Reach out on Signal: @TheOrdersProject.76

Banner & Backbone Authors’ Notes

Check out the new BroadBanner network and affiliate calendar!

Donate to Feeding America, today!

You being here shows that you have already begun the process of unfurling new Banners and forging new Backbones for a more progressive America. Please, take the time to become a paid, or free, subscriber to the Network — supporting us all and ensuring everyone in America can hear these messages.

The America we strive for — it is one where we willingly remember the teachings of our past, humbly learn from our failings, proudly celebrate our successes, and boldly lead the way into a future for all people.

Subscribe now

Reach out to the team if you are interested in volunteering time, supporting, and building these community driven platforms:

• Submit feedback directly to: info@bannerandbackbone.com

Support and subscribe to Banner & Backbone!

What Happened

What changed since Monday’s brief: the threat became a filed resolution with a deadline. Massie read the resolution just hours after the House opened its first session since the midterms [1]. He reintroduced eight articles he first raised in September, when Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., avoided a vote by sending lawmakers home early [2].

The articles accuse Hegseth of waging war on Iran without congressional authorization, as required by the War Powers Resolution [2]. They cite a U.S. strike on a school in Minab, Iran, that killed more than 150 people, including about 120 children, according to Al Jazeera [2]. They also call the strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific extrajudicial killings [2].

Other articles cover the seizure of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, restrictions on media access to the Pentagon and the war in Yemen against the Houthis [2]. The resolution also says Hegseth’s investigation and threatened prosecution of Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., violated the First Amendment [5].

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said, “I am a hard yes on the Hegseth resolution” [3]. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said, “Hegseth must stand trial before the Senate” [1]. If most Democrats follow Jeffries, Massie would need only a few Republicans to impeach [1].

House leaders must take up the matter within two legislative days, and opponents could table it or refer it to committee instead of voting on impeachment [3]. Johnson said, “We don’t impeach Cabinet secretaries for political gain or for cheap tricks” [2].

Why It Matters

A majority of the House can impeach, but removal takes two-thirds of the Senate [2]. Democrats are expected to hold about 54 Senate seats in January, short of the 67 needed to convict [2]. Neither Cabinet secretary the House has impeached before, William Belknap in 1876 and Alejandro Mayorkas in 2024, was convicted [3].

The charges reach civilians abroad and service members alike. About 6 in 10 voters told the AP Voter Poll that the U.S. made the “wrong decision” in taking military action against Iran [1]. Iran has kept striking bases in the Middle East used by the United States, causing billions of dollars in damage [1].

Our Read

The near-term fight is procedural, not constitutional. A motion to table or refer would let members avoid an up-or-down vote on the charges themselves, so how the House handles that motion is the clearest signal of where Republicans stand. A floor vote on the merits would put every member on record on war powers, civilian harm and the boat strikes.

The pattern here is accountability by calendar. Massie’s effort works mainly as pressure before January, when Democrats take control of both chambers. What the record still leaves out is the Pentagon’s own legal basis for the strikes named in the articles; none of the coverage shows the department answering those charges point by point.

The Other Side

Hegseth said, “If you want to take issue with what we did in Epic Fury or Rough Rider or nabbing Nicolás Maduro, you’re taking issue with the troops and what they accomplished, which is historic” [4]. He said the war was necessary because “someone had to confront the Iranian regime’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon” [4].

President Donald Trump said Hegseth is “guilty of two things, basically winning two wars” [2]. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, “I think Pete works really hard. He’s incredibly smart” [1]. Johnson said impeachment “in the middle of hostilities abroad would be a terrible, terrible look” for allies and enemies [1].

Is a Palantir Executive the Right Pick to Guard Critical Infrastructure?

What happened. The White House nominated Michael LoSapio, Palantir’s chief information security officer, to lead the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Monday [6][7]. CISA is the government’s main civilian cyber defense unit, working with operators of water systems, power grids and telecommunications networks [7]. It has been without a Senate-confirmed leader for almost 22 months, and its staff has fallen by about a third since 2025 [6]. If the Senate does not confirm him before this Congress ends, Trump would have to nominate him again for the incoming Democratic majority [7]. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., has said he plans to renew inquiries into Palantir’s work with the administration [7].

Our read. The agency that coordinates defense of grids, water systems and federal networks would be led by an executive from a vendor whose Homeland Security work is already under congressional scrutiny. That makes the confirmation timing the story: a lame-duck vote would skip the questions a Democratic Senate has signaled it wants to ask.

The other side. Democrats have questioned whether Palantir’s work with the Department of Homeland Security enables surveillance of Americans, and the company has denied conducting or enabling mass surveillance [7]. The administration was thought to be looking for someone from a high-profile tech company for the job [8].

Watch For

• A House vote on Massie’s resolution, or a motion to table it, no later than Wednesday [5].

• Hegseth’s news conference on Tuesday [4].

• Whether the Senate takes up LoSapio’s nomination before Republicans hand over control in January [7].

Call your House member before Wednesday and ask how they will vote on a motion to table the Hegseth resolution. You can find your representative through the House’s “Find Your Representative” page.

Open questions: If the House tables the resolution, does that end impeachment for this Congress or only delay it until January? Will LoSapio’s confirmation hearing include questions about Palantir’s Homeland Security contracts?

Related Reading

• This Week in Palantalk: A $1 Trillion Pentagon Fight, Shield AI’s $5.3 Billion Radar Bet & More

• This Week in Palantalk: ICE’s voter files and Palantir, Anduril’s $2.9 billion sub deal & more

• Weekly Roundup: DHS appointees asked CISA to secretly hack a voting machine, Medicaid not ready for new rules, the DHS heat ray, and more

Palantalk - where we talk tech, no fascism.

Sources

1. PBS NewsHour — WATCH: Rep. Massie speaks after filing Hegseth impeachment resolution. By Konstantin Toropin, Associated Press, published Nov 9, 2026

2. Al Jazeera — US congressman files resolution to impeach Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. By Umar Farooq, published Nov 9, 2026

3. The Intercept — Impeachment Vote Looms for Hegseth. By Nick Turse, published Nov 9, 2026

4. PBS NewsHour — WATCH: Hegseth announces he will hold news conference on impeachment threat to defend his record. By Associated Press, published Nov 9, 2026

5. The Guardian — Republican Thomas Massie moves to force vote to impeach Pete Hegseth. By Guardian staff, published Nov 9, 2026, updated Nov 10, 2026

6. yahoo.com — White House nominates Palantir’s LoSapio to lead Homeland Security’s cyber agency. By Reuters, published Nov 9, 2026

7. Defense One — Trump nominates Palantir security chief Michael LoSapio to lead CISA. By David DiMolfetta, published Nov 10, 2026

8. cyberscoop.com — Trump picks Palantir’s LoSapio to head CISA. By Tim Starks, published Nov 10, 2026

Compiled from 8 sources across 7 outlets. Source text as of Nov 10, 2026.

Actions You Can Take

Check out our new shared community calendar:

• Broad Banner

Call your public servants on important issues:

• 5calls.org

Join the efforts to de-flock the States:

• deflock.me

Service members can get un-biased information on legal vs illegal orders:

• Orders Project

• Reach out on Signal: @TheOrdersProject.76

Banner & Backbone Authors’ Notes

Check out the new BroadBanner network and affiliate calendar!

Donate to Feeding America, today!

You being here shows that you have already begun the process of unfurling new Banners and forging new Backbones for a more progressive America. Please, take the time to become a paid, or free, subscriber to the Network — supporting us all and ensuring everyone in America can hear these messages.

The America we strive for — it is one where we willingly remember the teachings of our past, humbly learn from our failings, proudly celebrate our successes, and boldly lead the way into a future for all people.

Subscribe now

Reach out to the team if you are interested in volunteering time, supporting, and building these community driven platforms:

• Submit feedback directly to: info@bannerandbackbone.com

Support and subscribe to Banner & Backbone!